{"id":108511,"date":"2025-02-10T10:33:38","date_gmt":"2025-02-10T15:33:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/\/?p=108511"},"modified":"2025-02-10T13:48:39","modified_gmt":"2025-02-10T18:48:39","slug":"net-metering-changes-are-sweeping-the-country-heres-how-solar-companies-can-prepare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/\/2025\/02\/net-metering-changes-are-sweeping-the-country-heres-how-solar-companies-can-prepare\/","title":{"rendered":"Net-metering changes are sweeping the country. Here\u2019s how solar companies can prepare"},"content":{"rendered":"
Net-metering policies are shifting across the country, and solar installation companies have a right to be concerned. California\u2019s NEM 3.0 slashed export compensation rates, Hawaii transitioned to a self-supply model and states like Arizona and West Virginia have significantly reduced net-metering rates. Now Virginia is in the crosshairs, with Appalachian Power Company (APCo) proposing<\/a> to cut net-metering compensation by more than 70%. When enacted, these attacks on net metering can have big effects on the solar industry.<\/p>\n For small solar installation businesses, this is a real threat \u2014 but there\u2019s hope. By looking at how markets like California and Hawaii navigated similar shifts, we can take proactive steps to protect our businesses and keep solar viable.<\/p>\n A residential solar + storage project completed by Virtue Solar in Virginia.<\/p><\/div>\n If your state is facing a net-metering overhaul, it\u2019s not over yet. Utilities often try to push these policies through quietly, but public pressure can shift the conversation. Here\u2019s how you can fight back:<\/p>\n Policies can change if they are brought into the light. Public support has reversed or mitigated net-metering rollbacks in several states, so don\u2019t assume the fight is lost.<\/p>\n Credit: Virtue Solar<\/p><\/div>\n A key part of advocacy is ensuring that customers understand why utilities’ arguments against net metering are flawed. Utilities claim that rooftop solar shifts costs onto non-solar customers, but studies<\/a> have repeatedly found little to no evidence of this. In reality, distributed solar benefits all ratepayers by reducing strain on the grid, lowering peak demand and decreasing the need for expensive grid infrastructure upgrades.<\/p>\n If utilities were truly concerned about cost-shifting, they would apply the principle evenly across their entire business model. Instead, they selectively target solar while ignoring the massive cost shifts inherent in their operations:<\/p>\n By equipping customers with this knowledge, solar companies can push back against utility misinformation and rally stronger public support for fair energy policies.<\/p>\n Enphase’s IQ Battery 5P. Credit: Virtue Solar<\/p><\/div>\nAdvocacy and coalition building: Fighting for fair policy<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a>
\n
Educating customers and debunking the cost-shift myth<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a>
\n
Preparing for the worst: Expanding into storage<\/strong><\/h3>\n
<\/a>