{"id":107530,"date":"2024-10-07T08:05:55","date_gmt":"2024-10-07T12:05:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/\/?p=107530"},"modified":"2024-10-04T07:57:04","modified_gmt":"2024-10-04T11:57:04","slug":"with-the-chevron-doctrine-overturned-effects-to-the-ira-still-unknown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/\/2024\/10\/with-the-chevron-doctrine-overturned-effects-to-the-ira-still-unknown\/","title":{"rendered":"With the Chevron doctrine overturned, effects to the IRA still unknown"},"content":{"rendered":"
This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 40-year-old precedent that said those with federal agency expertise should interpret ambiguous laws passed by Congress. By a 6-3 vote, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo<\/em><\/a> reversed the determination of Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, <\/em>a 1984 case known as the \u201cChevron doctrine.\u201d Loper Bright<\/em> now allows federal district court judges to use their own judgement in place of subject matter experts at federal agencies.<\/p>\n Renewable energy supporters are questioning whether aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act may also soon be under review, but as with any Supreme Court ruling, \u201cit\u2019s clear as mud,\u201d said Matt Petroski, partner at accounting firm Armanino.<\/a><\/p>\n \u201cThe Loper Bright<\/em> case didn\u2019t mean everything that has ever been written is now null and void. It\u2019s just a different lens,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s sort of taking the thumb off the scale slightly of this pure deference to a governmental agency. That doesn\u2019t mean there won\u2019t be deference to the governmental agency. It doesn\u2019t mean that the courts will automatically resolve every conflict.<\/p>\n \u201cI think it changes a lot, but it might change nothing,\u201d Petroski continued.<\/p>\n Since the IRA is a tax bill, there is less chance that entities could successfully take aspects to court, said Keith Martin, partner at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s very hard for anybody to bring a policy case against the IRS or Treasury about a statute,\u201d he said. \u201c[Loper Bright<\/em>]\u2019s greatest effect is probably on environmental regulations, because most of the ones dealing with climate change were adopted after big environmental statutes of the 1970s through 1990s, and those statutes were not written with climate change in mind, but the government is trying to adapt them to today\u2019s world.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/a>A long-time goal of fossil fuel industries and anti-regulation advocates, overturning the Chevron doctrine will likely lead to challenges of many older laws under the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s dominion. Rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions and restrict fossil fuel power plant pollution could be under review, now that agencies like the EPA no longer have automatic deference.<\/p>\n